Millions of people watch these videos on TikTok, but new research reveals that the popular clips often spread misinformation or half-truths.
A new study has analyzed the 100 most-viewed videos about ADHD on TikTok—and the results are concerning.
More than half of the videos contain claims that are inconsistent with established psychological research.
Many of the videos are based solely on personal experiences and lack credible sources. Yet they are widely shared and have collectively reached nearly half a billion views.
This becomes particularly problematic when everyday behaviors—such as sugar cravings or bumping into furniture—are presented as signs of ADHD.
According to the psychologists behind the study, this trend increases the risk of incorrect self-diagnosis, especially among young people.
Source of Information or Source of Misinformation?
Despite the many flaws identified, researchers don't view TikTok as purely harmful.
According to the study's lead author and PhD student in clinical psychology at the University of British Columbia, Vasileia Karasavva, the platform can also play a positive role in breaking taboos and getting more people to seek professional help.
For some users, the videos can serve as a first step towards a proper diagnosis – as long as they don't stop there.
"But there is also a downside. You risk spreading some misunderstandings about ADHD in relation to symptoms, treatments – and in relation to how widespread the disorder is," she explains to Videnskab.dk.
However, Danish experts warn against being seduced by social media. Diagnoses should not be based on 30 seconds of entertainment, but require a thorough and professional investigation.
A Call to the Experts
The study points to a growing interest in ADHD – and a lack of correct information.
Instead of ignoring platforms like TikTok, the researchers are calling for experts to start getting involved themselves.
By providing easy-to-understand and scientifically based information, you can meet the need for knowledge – and at the same time correct misunderstandings.
The article is based on information from Videnskab.dk.
