Asger Risom
The U.S. Vice President’s planned trip to Greenland is already drawing sharp rebukes from both Copenhagen and Nuuk.
Others are reading now
The Arctic has long been a site of strategic interest, but tensions surrounding the region have grown sharper in recent years. As climate change opens new routes and access to resources, geopolitical competition has intensified. Now, a visit by U.S. Vice President JD Vance to Greenland is drawing condemnation from both Danish and Greenlandic officials, further straining transatlantic relations.
As reported by HotNews.ro, Vance announced that he will travel to Greenland this Friday to join his wife, Usha Vance, originally scheduled to visit cultural and historical sites with their child. The trip has since taken on a military and diplomatic dimension, with the Vice President planning to tour the U.S. space base at Pituffik, citing the importance of “reviving security for the people of Greenland” in the name of global stability.
Uninvited and Unwelcome
Officials in both Nuuk and Copenhagen were quick to rebuke the visit. Greenland’s government released a statement emphasizing that no invitation—official or private—had been extended. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen also criticized the move, calling it “an unacceptable pressure.”
Although Vance’s visit to the military base is legally permitted under a 1951 defense agreement between Denmark and the U.S., the political timing is contentious. Greenland currently lacks a functioning government, and the visit comes amid broader frustration with U.S. foreign policy under President Donald Trump’s renewed administration.
Also read
Strategic Posturing and Political Optics
Vance’s rhetoric mirrors the Trump administration’s revived expansionist ambitions. During his first term, Trump proposed buying Greenland—an idea widely ridiculed and firmly rejected by both Denmark and the island’s residents. Now, with Trump back in office, similar themes are resurfacing, including talk of adding Canada as a U.S. state and reasserting control over the Panama Canal.
Analysts warn that this approach risks alienating key allies. “There is no better way to weaken America’s hand than by turning its back on allies,” said Dwayne Ryan Menezes of the Polar Research & Policy Initiative. As the Arctic grows more central to global strategy, so too does the need for diplomatic tact—something critics argue this visit sorely lacks.
